新的央视主持人大赛如火如荼地展开了，然而，真正引起人们关注的，却并非那些出场的年轻选手，而是那位从未露面的董卿。央视的主持人大赛，每年都吸引了成千上万的观众，而今年的比赛却掀起了不同的波澜，观众们的目光焦点，竟然并未在选手身上，而是紧紧盯着未曾现身的董卿。
这一届比赛的点评嘉宾阵容发生了变化，鲁健和康辉搭档，替代了原本的董卿与康辉组合。三位主持人都是央视主持的中坚力量，各具特色。董卿独树一帜，她在文艺类节目中的表现一如既往地深刻与优雅；康辉和鲁健则在新闻类节目中塑造了稳定的标杆形象。他们各自的风格，各自的特色，但若说到现场点评，董卿的风格无疑给人留下了最深刻的印象。
董卿的点评总能让人感到深深触动。她的语言既专业又细腻，点评犀利且富有温度，能够在不伤害选手自尊心的前提下，精准地指出问题所在。每一场比赛，若是有了董卿的点评，观众们的期待便不止是赛事本身，而是对她的每一句点评充满了浓烈的渴望。她的点评从来不是空洞的批评，而是深入选手心灵的真诚建议。记得2019年那一届比赛，董卿的点评一度成为了灵魂，她的金句频出，每一句话都击中要害，让选手们感动的同时，也让电视机前的观众大为折服。人们总是期待着她的点评，仿佛比赛中的每个选手，在她的话语中都能获得更深的启迪。
那一届比赛也因此成为了许多人心目中的“天花板”，而后来的比赛，却似乎难以达到那样的高度。商业化的氛围愈加浓重，比赛的亮点逐渐变得模糊，选手们的水平有了不小的差异，逐步走向年轻化，许多选手都来自于传媒院校的在读学生，这与2019届那些早已积累经验的选手相比，差距不言而喻。正如人们常说的那样，“神仙打架”，比赛中每一位选手的表现，都是让人不敢小觑的强者。
然而，有了董卿的点评，比赛便不仅仅是一场简单的竞技。她的点评风格鲜明，既具专业深度，又不失细腻与温暖，她总能一针见血地指出选手的不足，而她的语言，又能够巧妙地化解批评中的锋利与冷硬，带给选手和观众们的，始终是一种深思熟虑之后的真诚与理解。即便如此，缺少了董卿的点评后，比赛的气氛显得有些许乏力，点评逐渐变得温吞，缺乏直击灵魂的犀利，更多的是含蓄的回避和模糊的表达，或许是之前某些点评过于直白，导致了评委们的“谨慎”？
在过去，董卿用她特有的方式，传递着人生态度与生活智慧，她的每一句点评，都以真诚而美丽的词句来表达，仿佛是为了让选手看到更多的可能性，看到自己未曾察觉的潜力。每一句话，都是心灵的触动，给人留下深深的印象。然而，随着董卿的缺席，观众们再也无法在电视机前听到那份别具一格的真知灼见了。多少人心中都感叹：如果能再听一次她的点评，便是对比赛最大的期待。
与董卿相比，邹韵的主持风格似乎较为中规中矩。她虽然具备实力，是2019年主持人大赛的冠军，但在主持这样的大赛时，似乎稍欠松弛，常给人一种“端着”的感觉。她的造型也引发了不少讨论，尤其是她的发型，不禁让人怀疑，她是否得罪了造型师？那一头炸毛的发型，似乎和整个节目的氛围格格不入，令人费解。
而对于比赛的整体表现，不得不说，今年的选手水平相较于2019年，确实少了些亮点，缺少了曾经那种强者的对决。而点评的力度也显得弱了许多，缺乏董卿式的直接击中要害的“锋利”。整场比赛更像是一场漫长的流动，虽然背景音乐和制作有些燃点，但整体感觉却显得有些粗糙。选手们登场的镜头处理，也没有2019届时那么有气质，更多的是像某些综艺节目中的模式。
纵观今年的比赛，尽管也有些亮点，但似乎少了点什么。或许，正如那句话所说：“少了灵魂”。我们无可避免地怀念过去那种具有深度与温度的点评，也期望未来的比赛能带给我们更多的惊喜与感动。希望电视机前的每一位观众，能在这场比赛中找到他们期待的那份情感共鸣，找到属于自己的那个“亮点”。
愿所有的人，不论在什么领域，都能追求真理与自我超越，拥抱每一个新的挑战，收获更美好的明天。
---
英文版：
The new CCTV host competition has begun, but the attention of the audience is not on the contestants, but rather on the absent Dong Qing.
This year, the jury lineup has changed, with Lu Jian and Kang Hui pairing up to replace the previous combination of Dong Qing and Kang Hui. Each of these hosts represents a pillar of CCTV's hosting strength, with Dong Qing excelling in the arts category, while Kang Hui and Lu Jian set the bar for news broadcasting.
However, it was Dong Qing's presence as a commentator that left a lasting impression. Her remarks were professional yet filled with warmth and depth. She struck the perfect balance, offering insights that were both precise and tactful, always able to touch the hearts of both the contestants and the audience. Her commentary became the soul of the competition.
The 2019 competition, with Dong Qing as a commentator, set the standard for what many considered the \"peak\" of these events. Since then, competitions have become more commercialized, with younger contestants often from media universities. The difference is stark, and it's not just about experience—it’s about the intensity of the competition.
Without Dong Qing’s insightful commentary, the commentary in this year’s competition felt softer, lacking the sharpness and precision she was known for. It seemed as though the judges were hesitant to point out issues directly, possibly due to past incidents where their remarks were perceived as too harsh.
In her critiques, Dong Qing used sincerity and beautiful words to convey not only professional advice but also life lessons. Her words were concise, impactful, and always beneficial to the audience. It’s unfortunate that we may never hear her voice again in such a capacity.
Kong Hui, in his role as host, is solid, but his approach lacks the ease of past years. The contestants this year have shown some promise, but the overall atmosphere feels lackluster, and the production quality does not meet the high standards set by previous competitions.
I sincerely hope that future competitions will return to the level of excitement and inspiration that we once experienced, with fresh faces bringing new life to the stage.
May everyone continue to chase after excellence and embrace the challenges ahead, leading to a brighter tomorrow.
